Today’s guest post by Tracy P.
———————————————————————————————————-
There has been a lot of controversy in churches surrounding William Young’s novel, The Shack. Some leaders are using it as a springboard for discussion and sermon topics related to God’s healing and redemptive love. Others are viewing it as heretical, and insisting that their parishioners should refrain from reading it.
The book is clearly fiction, and not an attempt by Young to lay out a systematic theology. Yet it is so vivid in its depiction of God, and so powerful in the way it illustrates His pursuit of relationship with the individual human that it is clearly compelling, as evidenced by its surprisingly widespread popularity.
- Why do you think it is that so many seem to be wrestling with the compelling nature of the book on one hand, and its seeming unorthodoxy on the other?
- Did you find yourself wanting to “fix” any element of the book so you could like it with a clear conscience? How would you rewrite it, and why?
- Would you recommend this book to a Christian friend, or to a friend who was searching for his/her faith? Why or why not?
The Shack: A Myriad of Impressions (pt 2)
Today’s guest post by Tracy P.
———————————————————————————————————-
In the comments on the last post, there was a reference to the church’s role in defining for believers who God is. In The Shack, Mack and Jesus talk about the church within a broader conversation about society and its institutions. Mack’s frame of reference towards the church and the people in it is somewhat cynical. Jesus responds to him in this way (p. 181):
19 Comments
Posted in Christianity, Commentary, Culture, guest post, Tracy P